🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive an important European final versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining the team's most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Over System & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority In the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Football Order: Executives Above Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later bin him for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.